<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 493 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120868</link>
    <description>Rule 4(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules allows only 50% of the duty on capital goods to be taken as credit in the year of receipt, with the balance available in a later year if the goods remain in use. Rule 4(4) bars Cenvat credit only for the same duty component on which depreciation is claimed under section 32 of the Income-Tax Act. Where the assessee took credit only on the first 50% and claimed depreciation only on the unavailed balance, the rule was not breached. The document states that depreciation may be claimed on the portion of duty not taken as credit, and that adverse demand, interest and penalty orders could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 493 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120868</link>
      <description>Rule 4(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules allows only 50% of the duty on capital goods to be taken as credit in the year of receipt, with the balance available in a later year if the goods remain in use. Rule 4(4) bars Cenvat credit only for the same duty component on which depreciation is claimed under section 32 of the Income-Tax Act. Where the assessee took credit only on the first 50% and claimed depreciation only on the unavailed balance, the rule was not breached. The document states that depreciation may be claimed on the portion of duty not taken as credit, and that adverse demand, interest and penalty orders could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>