<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate imported conveyor belts curing line, finding that the goods were less than ten years old based on the supplier&#039;s invoice and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate indicating a 1992 make. The Tribunal emphasized that the year of manufacture on a small component does not determine the age of the entire machinery conclusively. Lack of independent expert opinion and discrepancies in the examination report weakened the department&#039;s case. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting the genuineness of the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate imported conveyor belts curing line, finding that the goods were less than ten years old based on the supplier&#039;s invoice and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate indicating a 1992 make. The Tribunal emphasized that the year of manufacture on a small component does not determine the age of the entire machinery conclusively. Lack of independent expert opinion and discrepancies in the examination report weakened the department&#039;s case. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting the genuineness of the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>