<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 37 of the Act for the premium paid on redemption of debentures, as the income from the business receipts was considered under the head &#039;Capital gains&#039;. The order of the CIT(A) was reversed, and the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was restored. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the revenue was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 37 of the Act for the premium paid on redemption of debentures, as the income from the business receipts was considered under the head &#039;Capital gains&#039;. The order of the CIT(A) was reversed, and the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was restored. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the revenue was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>