<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 440 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 7 lakhs and Rs. 22,15,116 made by the CIT(A) and confirming the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the source of income and that the CIT(A) exceeded its authority in enhancing the assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal determined the assessee&#039;s status as a non-resident during the assessment year based on supporting documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 440 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 7 lakhs and Rs. 22,15,116 made by the CIT(A) and confirming the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the source of income and that the CIT(A) exceeded its authority in enhancing the assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal determined the assessee&#039;s status as a non-resident during the assessment year based on supporting documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>