<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120820</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad addressed the refund of duty liability and penalty, unjust enrichment, and adjusting dues from deposited amounts. It was found that no duty demand was confirmed against the respondent company, only penalties were imposed. The Tribunal emphasized that the deposited amount was not on behalf of other companies with duty demands. Adjusting dues without consent was deemed illegal, and recovery should be from the actual persons concerned. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120820</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad addressed the refund of duty liability and penalty, unjust enrichment, and adjusting dues from deposited amounts. It was found that no duty demand was confirmed against the respondent company, only penalties were imposed. The Tribunal emphasized that the deposited amount was not on behalf of other companies with duty demands. Adjusting dues without consent was deemed illegal, and recovery should be from the actual persons concerned. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>