<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120818</link>
    <description>The restoration application was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi. The deposit made within the extended time allowed by the High Court was considered valid, despite the realization of the cheque being after the initial date of deposit. The appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120818</link>
      <description>The restoration application was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi. The deposit made within the extended time allowed by the High Court was considered valid, despite the realization of the cheque being after the initial date of deposit. The appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>