<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120816</link>
    <description>The appeal against the confiscation of excess goods under the Customs Act, 1962 was allowed by remand. The Tribunal directed a de novo consideration with the benefit of the DFRC scheme, granting the appellant the opportunity to present fresh licenses. Emphasizing the need for prompt resolution due to pending consignment clearance, the decision overturned the impugned order and provided specific directives for further proceedings, ensuring a fair opportunity for reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120816</link>
      <description>The appeal against the confiscation of excess goods under the Customs Act, 1962 was allowed by remand. The Tribunal directed a de novo consideration with the benefit of the DFRC scheme, granting the appellant the opportunity to present fresh licenses. Emphasizing the need for prompt resolution due to pending consignment clearance, the decision overturned the impugned order and provided specific directives for further proceedings, ensuring a fair opportunity for reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>