<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, amounting to 25% of the duty, as the duty had been deposited within the prescribed timeframe. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty was overturned, emphasizing the importance of timely payment to benefit from reduced penalties under Section 11AC. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, with no additional penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, amounting to 25% of the duty, as the duty had been deposited within the prescribed timeframe. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty was overturned, emphasizing the importance of timely payment to benefit from reduced penalties under Section 11AC. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, with no additional penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>