<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 356 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120802</link>
    <description>The court set aside the redemption fine imposed on the importer due to a genuine misdeclaration in the Import General Manifest (IGM) with no malicious intent. The court upheld the penalty on the steamer agent for the filing error in the IGM, deeming it appropriate. The judgment disposed of the appeals by overturning the redemption fine but affirming the penalty on the steamer agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 356 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120802</link>
      <description>The court set aside the redemption fine imposed on the importer due to a genuine misdeclaration in the Import General Manifest (IGM) with no malicious intent. The court upheld the penalty on the steamer agent for the filing error in the IGM, deeming it appropriate. The judgment disposed of the appeals by overturning the redemption fine but affirming the penalty on the steamer agent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>