<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit set by CBDT instructions, emphasizing adherence to avoid unnecessary litigation and protect small assessees&#039; interests. The decision was in line with the binding nature of CBDT instructions, as reinforced by a Delhi High Court precedent supporting appeal dismissal for non-compliance with tax effect thresholds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit set by CBDT instructions, emphasizing adherence to avoid unnecessary litigation and protect small assessees&#039; interests. The decision was in line with the binding nature of CBDT instructions, as reinforced by a Delhi High Court precedent supporting appeal dismissal for non-compliance with tax effect thresholds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>