<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 338 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120779</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that Section 11AC mandates a penalty equal to the duty amount in cases of fraud, collusion, or contravention of the law. The Court emphasized the statutory requirement for a minimum penalty once mens rea is established. The Tribunal upheld duty demand but reduced the penalty to Rs. 10,000 instead of the duty amount of Rs. 73,042, leading to a challenge by the Revenue. The Court highlighted the need for careful consideration in penalty imposition beyond a mechanical application equal to the duty determined, prompting a Larger Bench hearing due to the complexity of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 338 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120779</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that Section 11AC mandates a penalty equal to the duty amount in cases of fraud, collusion, or contravention of the law. The Court emphasized the statutory requirement for a minimum penalty once mens rea is established. The Tribunal upheld duty demand but reduced the penalty to Rs. 10,000 instead of the duty amount of Rs. 73,042, leading to a challenge by the Revenue. The Court highlighted the need for careful consideration in penalty imposition beyond a mechanical application equal to the duty determined, prompting a Larger Bench hearing due to the complexity of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>