<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 321 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120760</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, denied the appellant&#039;s request to waive the deposit for a drawback amount and penalty due to discrepancies in declared values in exports of readymade garments. The Tribunal ordered the appellant to make an additional deposit of Rs. 20 lacs within eight weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. Compliance reporting was scheduled for a specified date, and the stay application was granted under the mentioned terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 321 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120760</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, denied the appellant&#039;s request to waive the deposit for a drawback amount and penalty due to discrepancies in declared values in exports of readymade garments. The Tribunal ordered the appellant to make an additional deposit of Rs. 20 lacs within eight weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. Compliance reporting was scheduled for a specified date, and the stay application was granted under the mentioned terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>