<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 369 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants, including M/s. G.N. Rubber Tech Pvt. Ltd., for their involvement in a fraud scheme related to Customs Duty free imports of raw materials. The appellants&#039; actions, such as issuing false documents and making false entries, were deemed to fall within the scope of &quot;dealing with the goods&quot; under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found no justification for waiving pre-deposits, directing M/s. G.N. Rubber Tech Pvt. Ltd. to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs and other appellants to make full deposits. Failure to comply within 8 weeks would lead to dismissal of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 369 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants, including M/s. G.N. Rubber Tech Pvt. Ltd., for their involvement in a fraud scheme related to Customs Duty free imports of raw materials. The appellants&#039; actions, such as issuing false documents and making false entries, were deemed to fall within the scope of &quot;dealing with the goods&quot; under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found no justification for waiving pre-deposits, directing M/s. G.N. Rubber Tech Pvt. Ltd. to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs and other appellants to make full deposits. Failure to comply within 8 weeks would lead to dismissal of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>