<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the refund of Rs. 4,24,415/- with 6% interest per annum. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable and held that the appellants were entitled to the refund amount paid under coercion during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The refund claim rejection was overturned based on the lack of specific directions regarding the payment made under coercion during the stay order extension, leading to the approval of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:27:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the refund of Rs. 4,24,415/- with 6% interest per annum. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable and held that the appellants were entitled to the refund amount paid under coercion during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The refund claim rejection was overturned based on the lack of specific directions regarding the payment made under coercion during the stay order extension, leading to the approval of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>