<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 361 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellants had acted in good faith, disclosed all relevant details, and there was no suppression of facts. The confirmation of value addition was deemed not sustainable and barred by time. The appeal was allowed on the time bar issue with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:59:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 361 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellants had acted in good faith, disclosed all relevant details, and there was no suppression of facts. The confirmation of value addition was deemed not sustainable and barred by time. The appeal was allowed on the time bar issue with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>