<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues related to tax deductions and profit computations. It directed the AO to exclude 90% of net interest for section 80HHC, include taxable income from the 100% EOU in business profits, and exclude excise duty from total turnover. The Tribunal upheld the allocation of actual expenses for the 100% EOU and included interest income from surplus funds in business profits for section 10B. Additionally, it allowed the deduction of prior period expenses, instructing the AO to recompute deductions and profits according to these findings. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues related to tax deductions and profit computations. It directed the AO to exclude 90% of net interest for section 80HHC, include taxable income from the 100% EOU in business profits, and exclude excise duty from total turnover. The Tribunal upheld the allocation of actual expenses for the 100% EOU and included interest income from surplus funds in business profits for section 10B. Additionally, it allowed the deduction of prior period expenses, instructing the AO to recompute deductions and profits according to these findings. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>