<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 652 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120702</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the tax effect being below the Rs. 2,00,000 threshold set by CBDT Instruction No. 2. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of CBDT instructions on income-tax authorities, supported by judicial precedents. It also highlighted the financial burden and inefficiency of unnecessary litigation, in line with CBDT&#039;s objective to reduce such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 652 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120702</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the tax effect being below the Rs. 2,00,000 threshold set by CBDT Instruction No. 2. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of CBDT instructions on income-tax authorities, supported by judicial precedents. It also highlighted the financial burden and inefficiency of unnecessary litigation, in line with CBDT&#039;s objective to reduce such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>