<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to exclude certain charges from the assessable value of imported goods, following the precedent set by the Apex Court in a similar case. The charges in question were deemed as handling charges rather than transport costs, aligning with Rule 9(2)(b) of the Customs Valuation Rules. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the legal provisions and distinguishing between different types of charges, ultimately ruling in favor of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to exclude certain charges from the assessable value of imported goods, following the precedent set by the Apex Court in a similar case. The charges in question were deemed as handling charges rather than transport costs, aligning with Rule 9(2)(b) of the Customs Valuation Rules. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the legal provisions and distinguishing between different types of charges, ultimately ruling in favor of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>