https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120687 The case involved a dispute over modvat credit on endorsed invoices. The court directed a reconsideration of a Division Bench ruling due to conflicting interpretations with a Larger Bench decision to ensure consistency in legal principles. The judge emphasized the need to align judicial decisions for coherence within the legal framework, instructing the matter to be presented before the Hon'ble President for the constitution of a Division Bench for review. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:08:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120687 The case involved a dispute over modvat credit on endorsed invoices. The court directed a reconsideration of a Division Bench ruling due to conflicting interpretations with a Larger Bench decision to ensure consistency in legal principles. The judge emphasized the need to align judicial decisions for coherence within the legal framework, instructing the matter to be presented before the Hon'ble President for the constitution of a Division Bench for review. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120687