<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 645 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for the cost of the superstructure and granted pro rata exemption under sections 54/54F for the two flats occupied by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 90,000 for car parking, concluding that the cost was already included in the total sale consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 645 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for the cost of the superstructure and granted pro rata exemption under sections 54/54F for the two flats occupied by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 90,000 for car parking, concluding that the cost was already included in the total sale consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>