<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 351 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120664</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the reduction in basic Custom duty did not result in unjust enrichment for the assessee as the price of the final product had significantly decreased, and the small refund did not have a substantial impact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 351 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120664</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the reduction in basic Custom duty did not result in unjust enrichment for the assessee as the price of the final product had significantly decreased, and the small refund did not have a substantial impact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>