<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the rent paid by the assessee was not excessive or unreasonable compared to the market rate of Rs. 160 per sq. ft. The Tribunal considered legitimate business needs and benefits, deleting the entire disallowance. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the rent paid by the assessee was not excessive or unreasonable compared to the market rate of Rs. 160 per sq. ft. The Tribunal considered legitimate business needs and benefits, deleting the entire disallowance. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>