<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 540 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120651</link>
    <description>The case involved a partnership firm settling duty liability for alleged clandestine removals of readymade garments. The firm admitted a duty liability of Rs. 20,11,438/- due to calculation errors, which were rectified with a revised duty amount accepted by the Bench. The applicant also requested and was granted immunities including waiver of interest, penalty, and prosecution, based on cooperation and genuine mistakes. The Bench allowed deemed credit under a specific notification, recognizing the firm&#039;s intention to rectify the situation. Overall, the judgment balanced rectifying mistakes, cooperation, and compliance with legal provisions in Central Excise settlement matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 540 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120651</link>
      <description>The case involved a partnership firm settling duty liability for alleged clandestine removals of readymade garments. The firm admitted a duty liability of Rs. 20,11,438/- due to calculation errors, which were rectified with a revised duty amount accepted by the Bench. The applicant also requested and was granted immunities including waiver of interest, penalty, and prosecution, based on cooperation and genuine mistakes. The Bench allowed deemed credit under a specific notification, recognizing the firm&#039;s intention to rectify the situation. Overall, the judgment balanced rectifying mistakes, cooperation, and compliance with legal provisions in Central Excise settlement matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>