<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 660 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120632</link>
    <description>The application was rejected as it did not meet the criteria of a pending &quot;case&quot; under Section 31 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Bench emphasized that the condition of pendency applies to both original and appellate/revisionary proceedings, and since no proceedings were pending, the Settlement Commission could not entertain the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 660 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120632</link>
      <description>The application was rejected as it did not meet the criteria of a pending &quot;case&quot; under Section 31 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Bench emphasized that the condition of pendency applies to both original and appellate/revisionary proceedings, and since no proceedings were pending, the Settlement Commission could not entertain the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>