<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 639 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that payments to advertising agencies were trade discounts, not commissions. Therefore, the assessee was not considered in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, and no tax deduction at source (TDS) was required under section 194H. The decision highlighted the principal-to-principal relationship between the assessee and the advertising agencies, leading to the deletion of tax and interest imposed earlier.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 639 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that payments to advertising agencies were trade discounts, not commissions. Therefore, the assessee was not considered in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, and no tax deduction at source (TDS) was required under section 194H. The decision highlighted the principal-to-principal relationship between the assessee and the advertising agencies, leading to the deletion of tax and interest imposed earlier.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>