<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120605</link>
    <description>Depreciation on assets of an international division was disputed on the ground of non-use. The Tribunal held that depreciation is allowable where the assets form part of the common block of assets and were ready for use, applying the &quot;ready for use&quot; test; the disallowance was rejected. Expenditure on leasehold premises treated as temporary structures was held to be revenue in nature since it did not create a capital asset; the deduction allowed by CIT(A) was upheld. Recruitment and training costs were held to be revenue expenditure as they facilitate business operations without creating an enduring capital asset; disallowance was rejected. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss on a working-capital loan was held to accrue year-end as an ascertained liability; deduction upheld. Deferred tax and provision for doubtful debts were held not addable to book profit under s.115JB; additions deleted and appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 15:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120605</link>
      <description>Depreciation on assets of an international division was disputed on the ground of non-use. The Tribunal held that depreciation is allowable where the assets form part of the common block of assets and were ready for use, applying the &quot;ready for use&quot; test; the disallowance was rejected. Expenditure on leasehold premises treated as temporary structures was held to be revenue in nature since it did not create a capital asset; the deduction allowed by CIT(A) was upheld. Recruitment and training costs were held to be revenue expenditure as they facilitate business operations without creating an enduring capital asset; disallowance was rejected. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss on a working-capital loan was held to accrue year-end as an ascertained liability; deduction upheld. Deferred tax and provision for doubtful debts were held not addable to book profit under s.115JB; additions deleted and appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>