<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the assessee. It upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, confirmed the taxability of the unutilized amount in the Capital Gain account under section 54(2), and ruled that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was mandatory and not subject to waiver due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s inaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the assessee. It upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, confirmed the taxability of the unutilized amount in the Capital Gain account under section 54(2), and ruled that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was mandatory and not subject to waiver due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s inaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>