<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120594</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal upheld the penalty u/s 221, ruling that no separate notice of demand u/s 156 is necessary for self-assessment tax defaults. The assessee&#039;s plea for rectification was dismissed, and the penalty imposition was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120594</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal upheld the penalty u/s 221, ruling that no separate notice of demand u/s 156 is necessary for self-assessment tax defaults. The assessee&#039;s plea for rectification was dismissed, and the penalty imposition was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>