<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 325 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty evasion and penalties imposed on the appellant Export Oriented Unit (EOU) and company officials for disposing of duty-free materials in the market. Despite arguments for waiver based on export unit status extension and financial hardship, the Tribunal found no merit and directed the appellant to deposit the duty demand of Rs. 1.17 crores within 12 weeks. Failure to comply would lead to appeal dismissal, with reporting set for April 2, 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 325 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty evasion and penalties imposed on the appellant Export Oriented Unit (EOU) and company officials for disposing of duty-free materials in the market. Despite arguments for waiver based on export unit status extension and financial hardship, the Tribunal found no merit and directed the appellant to deposit the duty demand of Rs. 1.17 crores within 12 weeks. Failure to comply would lead to appeal dismissal, with reporting set for April 2, 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>