<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 304 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no default in duty payment as the delays were justified. The facility for fortnightly payment can only be withdrawn after three defaults, and in this case, there was only one remaining default after considering the contested instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 304 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no default in duty payment as the delays were justified. The facility for fortnightly payment can only be withdrawn after three defaults, and in this case, there was only one remaining default after considering the contested instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>