<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 531 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120539</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 7,06,173 on account of foreign exchange fluctuation by the CIT (Appeals). The Assessing Officer had treated the amount as notional loss, but the CIT (Appeals) found it to be a net gain. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039; decision, stating that the loss was actual and not notional. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 531 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120539</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 7,06,173 on account of foreign exchange fluctuation by the CIT (Appeals). The Assessing Officer had treated the amount as notional loss, but the CIT (Appeals) found it to be a net gain. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039; decision, stating that the loss was actual and not notional. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>