<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 21.75 lakhs as undisclosed income, as the entries in the seized diary were satisfactorily explained and matched the regular books. The addition of Rs. 30,000 was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination, with instructions to allow the assessee to present evidence supporting their explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:34:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 21.75 lakhs as undisclosed income, as the entries in the seized diary were satisfactorily explained and matched the regular books. The addition of Rs. 30,000 was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination, with instructions to allow the assessee to present evidence supporting their explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>