https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120523 A factual error on the record in rejecting cross-objections as time-barred justified recall under section 254(2) read with rule 24 because condonation had already been granted for some years and condonation applications were on record for the rest. The Tribunal treated the earlier dismissal as based on an incorrect assumption and restored the appeals and cross-objections. Administrative control under section 255 and rules 3, 4, 19 and 20 includes fixing and preponing hearing dates; that action, taken after notice to the parties, did not amount to a review of an earlier adjournment order. en-us Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:29:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120523 A factual error on the record in rejecting cross-objections as time-barred justified recall under section 254(2) read with rule 24 because condonation had already been granted for some years and condonation applications were on record for the rest. The Tribunal treated the earlier dismissal as based on an incorrect assumption and restored the appeals and cross-objections. Administrative control under section 255 and rules 3, 4, 19 and 20 includes fixing and preponing hearing dates; that action, taken after notice to the parties, did not amount to a review of an earlier adjournment order. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120523