<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow credits under section 115JAA for taxes paid under KVSS and MAT for a period of five years. It was held that the income determined under KVSS falls within the scope of section 115JAA, and opting for KVSS does not negate the entitlement to the benefits of section 115JAA, as supported by legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow credits under section 115JAA for taxes paid under KVSS and MAT for a period of five years. It was held that the income determined under KVSS falls within the scope of section 115JAA, and opting for KVSS does not negate the entitlement to the benefits of section 115JAA, as supported by legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>