<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120515</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remanding the case to the Assessing Officer to reassess the taxability of the stock options, considering compliance with the Central Government&#039;s guidelines for ESOPs. The Tribunal emphasized the indirect employer-employee relationship and the applicability of the proviso to Section 17(2)(iii) in determining the taxability under &#039;Salaries.&#039;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120515</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remanding the case to the Assessing Officer to reassess the taxability of the stock options, considering compliance with the Central Government&#039;s guidelines for ESOPs. The Tribunal emphasized the indirect employer-employee relationship and the applicability of the proviso to Section 17(2)(iii) in determining the taxability under &#039;Salaries.&#039;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>