<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 377 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120504</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal on both issues. First, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of depreciation on pre-operative expenses, agreeing that such expenses can be capitalized and are eligible for depreciation. Second, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling on the computation of book profit under section 115JB, affirming that the income credited to the Profit &amp; Loss Account should be considered for deduction, not the amount determined by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with judicial precedents and interpretations of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 377 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120504</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal on both issues. First, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of depreciation on pre-operative expenses, agreeing that such expenses can be capitalized and are eligible for depreciation. Second, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling on the computation of book profit under section 115JB, affirming that the income credited to the Profit &amp; Loss Account should be considered for deduction, not the amount determined by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with judicial precedents and interpretations of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>