<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of interest income under &#039;income from other sources&#039; and disallowed the interest expenditure claimed by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of bad debts claim, the Tribunal allowed the claim for bad debts written off in accordance with section 36(1)(vii). The appeal for assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed, while the appeal for assessment year 2003-04 was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of interest income under &#039;income from other sources&#039; and disallowed the interest expenditure claimed by the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of bad debts claim, the Tribunal allowed the claim for bad debts written off in accordance with section 36(1)(vii). The appeal for assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed, while the appeal for assessment year 2003-04 was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>