https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120489 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal in a case concerning the interpretation of an agreement for brand name ownership. The appellant, a manufacturer of 'Nagmati' machines, had a valid agreement with another company regarding the brand name. The Tribunal held that the appellant should not be denied the SSI benefit based on using the brand name as per the agreement. Emphasizing the importance of honoring contractual agreements, the Tribunal granted the appellant the SSI benefit, highlighting the significance of adhering to written agreements in commercial transactions to determine eligibility for benefits. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120489 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal in a case concerning the interpretation of an agreement for brand name ownership. The appellant, a manufacturer of 'Nagmati' machines, had a valid agreement with another company regarding the brand name. The Tribunal held that the appellant should not be denied the SSI benefit based on using the brand name as per the agreement. Emphasizing the importance of honoring contractual agreements, the Tribunal granted the appellant the SSI benefit, highlighting the significance of adhering to written agreements in commercial transactions to determine eligibility for benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120489