<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 459 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU, in a case challenging duty confirmation by the Commissioner of Customs for exported marine products. The Tribunal found that the items were processed and preserved, making them eligible for higher DEPB credit as per the Development Commissioner&#039;s order. Despite initial document errors, subsequent evidence confirmed the processing and preservation, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 459 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU, in a case challenging duty confirmation by the Commissioner of Customs for exported marine products. The Tribunal found that the items were processed and preserved, making them eligible for higher DEPB credit as per the Development Commissioner&#039;s order. Despite initial document errors, subsequent evidence confirmed the processing and preservation, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>