<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 456 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120474</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal, stating the appellant is entitled to interest from the date of Presidential assent to the Finance Bill 1995 until the actual refund payment date, rejecting the requirement for additional documents beyond those already submitted for the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 456 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120474</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal, stating the appellant is entitled to interest from the date of Presidential assent to the Finance Bill 1995 until the actual refund payment date, rejecting the requirement for additional documents beyond those already submitted for the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>