<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 615 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120472</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 11 lakhs as the assessee&#039;s income from undisclosed sources, modifying it to be added under Section 69A instead of Section 68. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant relief of Rs. 54,905 for interest paid, finding no nexus between the interest-free loans given and the loan from Smt. Anju Agarwal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 615 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120472</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 11 lakhs as the assessee&#039;s income from undisclosed sources, modifying it to be added under Section 69A instead of Section 68. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant relief of Rs. 54,905 for interest paid, finding no nexus between the interest-free loans given and the loan from Smt. Anju Agarwal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>