<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120460</link>
    <description>Failure by a manufacturing assessee to maintain day-to-day production and stock registers can justify rejection of books under section 145 where substitute records do not reliably show stock movement, wastage or by-products. Once the accounts are rejected, profit may be estimated on a best-judgment basis, but the estimate must be reasonable and supported by comparable material; an arbitrary gross profit rate was therefore modified. Unexplained cash credits and a suspense account entry were sustained because identity and confirmation evidence was inadequate. Commission expenditure was allowed only for the payment supported by loan-arranging service details. Deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I were to be recomputed on the revised profit basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120460</link>
      <description>Failure by a manufacturing assessee to maintain day-to-day production and stock registers can justify rejection of books under section 145 where substitute records do not reliably show stock movement, wastage or by-products. Once the accounts are rejected, profit may be estimated on a best-judgment basis, but the estimate must be reasonable and supported by comparable material; an arbitrary gross profit rate was therefore modified. Unexplained cash credits and a suspense account entry were sustained because identity and confirmation evidence was inadequate. Commission expenditure was allowed only for the payment supported by loan-arranging service details. Deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I were to be recomputed on the revised profit basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>