<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee is entitled to interest under section 132B(4) for the period from 18-7-2002 to 31-12-2003. The Tribunal emphasized that the seizure of disclosed assets was not warranted, and interest should be calculated as per the provisions of section 132B(4)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee is entitled to interest under section 132B(4) for the period from 18-7-2002 to 31-12-2003. The Tribunal emphasized that the seizure of disclosed assets was not warranted, and interest should be calculated as per the provisions of section 132B(4)(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>