<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 446 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming duty demand and penalties on the appellants for alleged evasion of Central Excise duty on mosquito bed nets supplied to Government departments. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to establish manufacturing capacity and substantiated claims, remanding the case for a fresh assessment based on all evidence presented. The judgment underscores the significance of factual documentation and manufacturing capacity in determining liability for duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:06:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 446 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming duty demand and penalties on the appellants for alleged evasion of Central Excise duty on mosquito bed nets supplied to Government departments. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to establish manufacturing capacity and substantiated claims, remanding the case for a fresh assessment based on all evidence presented. The judgment underscores the significance of factual documentation and manufacturing capacity in determining liability for duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>