<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 444 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery proceedings. It found irregularities in the sale of imported goods worth over Rs. 30 lakhs for a nominal amount of Rs. 20,000 before the final order was issued. The Tribunal noted procedural flaws in the revenue&#039;s actions, emphasizing the appellants&#039; right to redemption and the impropriety of selling goods before assessments were completed. The stay application was approved, allowing the appeal to proceed while halting recovery efforts, ensuring the appellant&#039;s opportunity to challenge the sale through legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 444 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery proceedings. It found irregularities in the sale of imported goods worth over Rs. 30 lakhs for a nominal amount of Rs. 20,000 before the final order was issued. The Tribunal noted procedural flaws in the revenue&#039;s actions, emphasizing the appellants&#039; right to redemption and the impropriety of selling goods before assessments were completed. The stay application was approved, allowing the appeal to proceed while halting recovery efforts, ensuring the appellant&#039;s opportunity to challenge the sale through legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>