<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the party&#039;s appeal due to the time-barred nature of the demands for the period 1995-96 to 1997-98. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement under Section 11AC was rejected as the appellants successfully demonstrated that the demands were not adequately supported by evidence and the show cause notice was issued after an unreasonable delay, rendering it time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the party&#039;s appeal due to the time-barred nature of the demands for the period 1995-96 to 1997-98. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement under Section 11AC was rejected as the appellants successfully demonstrated that the demands were not adequately supported by evidence and the show cause notice was issued after an unreasonable delay, rendering it time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>