<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 601 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03, determining that the assessee was entitled to relief under section 91 despite the application of section 115JB. The CIT&#039;s order under section 263 was quashed, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. The Tribunal did not address the issue of limitation, considering it academic since the CIT&#039;s order was overturned on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 601 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03, determining that the assessee was entitled to relief under section 91 despite the application of section 115JB. The CIT&#039;s order under section 263 was quashed, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. The Tribunal did not address the issue of limitation, considering it academic since the CIT&#039;s order was overturned on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>