<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 448 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120428</link>
    <description>Imported goods were revalued under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988 after the declared transaction values were not accepted in full. For the main imported system, contemporaneous imports of similar goods supported valuation under Rule 5 despite minor differences; extra items and peripherals were valued under Rule 8. For later imports sold in India, deductive valuation under Rule 7(1) was applied using sale prices and deductions. The Settlement Commission accepted the disclosure and settlement application, settled the duty liability, and granted immunity from penalty and prosecution, with interest payable only at the rate fixed in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 448 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120428</link>
      <description>Imported goods were revalued under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988 after the declared transaction values were not accepted in full. For the main imported system, contemporaneous imports of similar goods supported valuation under Rule 5 despite minor differences; extra items and peripherals were valued under Rule 8. For later imports sold in India, deductive valuation under Rule 7(1) was applied using sale prices and deductions. The Settlement Commission accepted the disclosure and settlement application, settled the duty liability, and granted immunity from penalty and prosecution, with interest payable only at the rate fixed in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>