<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 444 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120423</link>
    <description>The appeals succeeded as the impugned order was set aside based on the legal principles discussed regarding the finality of the earlier classification order and the improper application of Section 11A for recovery of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 444 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120423</link>
      <description>The appeals succeeded as the impugned order was set aside based on the legal principles discussed regarding the finality of the earlier classification order and the improper application of Section 11A for recovery of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>