<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application and appeal concerning the import of Second Hand Photocopier Machines. Despite conflicting judgments from Kerala High Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Tribunal relied on the Larger Bench judgment favoring the importability of such machines. Emphasizing the relevance of jurisdiction-specific High Court rulings, the Tribunal concluded that the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment should apply to the case, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application and appeal concerning the import of Second Hand Photocopier Machines. Despite conflicting judgments from Kerala High Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Tribunal relied on the Larger Bench judgment favoring the importability of such machines. Emphasizing the relevance of jurisdiction-specific High Court rulings, the Tribunal concluded that the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment should apply to the case, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>